Study design

prospective comparative, consecutive, nonrandomized study

Study time

2013.6.1-2016.10.1

Country

Egypt

Object

patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent RS-RARP or ORP and met our inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

patients more than 70 years old, and those who had a history of neurogenic bladder, neoadjuvant hormol therapy, previous,urethral surgery, and missing or incomplete data.Patients with follow-up less than 1-year were ex_x005fcluded.

Sample size

184

Topic classification

Comparison of surgical techniques

Keypoint

RS-RARP had better perioperative outcomes and faster recovery of uriry continence compared with ORP. Short-term oncological outcomes were comparable between both surgical approaches.

Year